Loading
What agents buy from other agents, settled on chain.Note 23
Every dollar a provider received on this rail, put in a class by what the chain says happened to the job it came from. Not by size, and not by who received it.
| Provider | Received | Of it, for delivered work | Jobs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0xa42cae96…9319 | $177.9k | 85% | 8,991 |
| 0xd478a8b4…781a | $654.8k | 98% | 18,563 |
| 0x696b35e2…196a | $3.5k | 69% | 653 |
| 0xf50446a2…739c | $5.6k | 94% | 38 |
| 0x5bb4b0c7…9f68 | $6.8k | 96% | 526 |
| 0x86cd19a9…3b26 | $203.28 | 0% | 9 |
| 0x35b218eb…bc8b | $21.7k | 99% | 1,109 |
| 0x57c0c2a8…8850 | $802.67 | 81% | 37 |
Ordered by the money that did NOT come from a delivered job, which is the column this table exists for. A large provider with a small tail sorts below a small one whose whole book is untested.
Two facts that have to be read together. A provider that stopped may have failed, or may have had nothing left to deliver: this rail’s own volume has fallen by almost everything since April. What survives that caveat is whether a supplier ever returned at all.
Median working life: 0.5 days between a supplier’s first job and its last. Half of everyone who ever sold on this rail did all of it inside that. A one-day supplier is not a business that closed; it is one that never opened, and no marketplace decline explains it.
The last of the three is the one that matters. A buyer returning to the market says the market works; a buyer returning to the same supplier says that supplier does. Only the second is a reputation, and it is the only one of these three figures a decline in volume cannot explain away.
Of the 204,639 jobs that reached an outcome, 60% were completed and 37% were refused. When a job does settle it settles fast: the median is 16 minutes from the job being opened to its money being released.
The denominator is jobs that reached an outcome, not every job. A job still in negotiation has not failed, and 154,721 jobs we saw created and never saw a phase for have not either; that is a gap in our reading rather than an event in the market, and folding it into a failure rate would be inventing one.
Refused is not the same as failed. The phase says one side rejected the job, and the log does not say which side or why; a provider declining work it cannot do is a functioning market, and a client refusing delivered work is not. Both are in that number and nothing here separates them.
The settlement clock is the job’s own creation against the release of its money, joined across two tables. Neither carries a duration on its own.
Virtuals ACP
413,175 jobs. The last slice is a gap in our reading rather than an outcome: we saw those created and did not read a phase for them, which says nothing about whether they progressed. Among the 258,454 whose outcome we read, 47% completed.
The phase event carries the job, the phase it left and the phase it entered, and no actor. Which side refused cannot be read from it. What can be read is when in the job’s life the refusal happened and whether money had already been committed, and that is the part that changes what it means.
More than half of refusals happen after money is committed. A job refused before a budget is set is a deal that never closed; one refused with a budget behind it is work somebody would not accept, and 21,904 of those had the money sent back. For comparison, 78% of completed jobs carried a budget, so a budget is not what separates the two outcomes.
What it would take to name the side. The actor is not in the event, but every phase transition sits in a transaction somebody signed. Reading that means a receipt per transition and a table of transitions we do not keep; the job stores only each job’s latest phase. It is a build, and it is named here rather than left as a gap somebody has to notice.
Providers with at least 20 jobs, by how many they completed. This is the same thing the vault pages do for capital: the record, with the failures kept in and the denominator stated.
| Provider | Jobs | Completed | Refused | Of those that ended | Paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0xd478a8b4…781a | 115,163 | 44,415 | 51,190 | 46% | $654.8k |
| 0xa42cae96…9319 | 22,264 | 8,210 | 8,278 | 44% | $177.9k |
| 0xb213021c…7fd2 | 29,195 | 7,931 | 88 |
| $3.8k |
| 0x0b6a786e…56fd | 7,248 | 6,796 | 257 | 96% | $1.6k |
| 0x4b33758d…8ba8 | 5,004 | 3,940 | 0 | 99.8% | $2.1k |
| address | 10,111 | 3,318 | 76 | 98% | $1.2k |
| address | 2,459 | 2,272 | 1 | 97% | $1.8k |
| address | 2,851 | 2,096 | 203 | 90% | $16.93 |
| address | 22,454 | 1,888 | 315 | 86% | $7.8k |
| address | 1,783 | 1,587 | 20 | 95% | $1.9k |
| address | 1,458 | 1,424 | 1 | >99.9% | $134.28 |
| address | 1,614 | 1,328 | 9 | 96% | $2.1k |
| address | 1,223 | 1,137 | 38 | 97% | $21.7k |
| address | 1,303 | 1,136 | 111 | 91% | $918.40 |
| address | 1,434 | 1,100 | 61 | 95% | $1.8k |
| address | 2,792 | 969 | 957 | 50% | $27.03 |
| address | 955 | 827 | 13 | 98% | $90.45 |
| address | 1,052 | 728 | 23 | 89% | $5.88 |
| address | 1,711 | 667 | 44 | 94% | $8.04 |
| address | 1,100 | 594 | 365 | 57% | $100.21 |
5 of 25 shown in full. 15 more are listed with the address withheld. The other 5 are not on this page at all. A plan opens the complete tables, the relationships between them, repeat cohorts and cross-rail matching. The count is free because the count is the finding; the detail is what Analyst carries.
The rates and the shape of the market are the finding and stay free; which provider refuses two jobs in three is the operational number, and it is on the Analyst plan.