There is no overall band for these dimensions to disagree with.
Evidence · Not scored · 3 of 5 components read (45% of the weight)
Point at a risk to read what it rests on.
This vault issues one share per unit of the asset and its contract reports exactly as many assets as shares, so the unit price CANNOT move. A flat price here is a fact about the design and not a measurement of performance: any return has to be paid some other way than through the price, and we do not read one. AND NONE OF IT IS HELD HERE: every unit has been deployed somewhere else, so whatever is earned happens downstream of this contract and could never show in its share price.
100.0% of the capital we can attribute here, or $306.62, belongs to 3 addresses that also hold an open vault elsewhere, the deepest of them in 37. They can leave all of them on the same morning.
Pick or type an amount to weigh it against both: what the venue says could leave now, and the largest single withdrawal anybody has made here.
The contract imposes no notice period and no request step: a redeem that succeeds settles in the transaction that asks for it, and it succeeds only if the vault holds enough to pay at that moment, which is the liquidity reading and a separate question.
There is no queue and no lock-up in the contract.
The three after Held add to it. Not verified is in no market we read: it may be cash or another allocation and is not counted as cash. The venue’s withdrawable figure overlaps them and is not added to them.
Not lent is what no borrower holds: supplied and not borrowed, or in no market we read, which is not verified as cash. What the contract will actually pay out can be less, and the evidence below says which of the two we read for this vault.
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict.
It moves only when the strategy earns or loses; deposits do not move it.
Not computed: the share price is not read as a return here, because its share price is fixed by construction — the contract mints one share per unit — so the return is not in the price and cannot be read from it.
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Six questions, and what we hold for each. 1 of 6 is not measured for this vault.
| Source mark | Question | What we hold | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| What does it hold or lend into? | 1 collateral read, $116.2k supplied, across 2 marketsRead from the vault’s own holdings. Concentration and the assets themselves are below. Its largest single market holds 100% of what anybody has supplied there. | Measured | |
| How much could leave now? | $116.2kWhat the contract will pay out now, read from it. Not the same as what is idle. | Measured | |
| Who runs it, and what else have they run? | HyperithmA named operator with a record across every vault they run, including the ones that closed. | Measured |
Attributed collateral only.
A vault accepting many collaterals at once reports less here than it holds, so this is what we can attribute rather than everything it is lent against.
Band width is dollars on one scale. Attributed supply only: a vault in many markets at once reports less here than it holds.
Locked here: every depositor we read with their share of the vault, the largest single wallet, and the ledger of each deposit and withdrawal. A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inWhat this page cannot show yet, and why.
| Risk | Reads | In the band | From |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market | Not read | Yes | nothing fed it |
| Liquidity | Low | Yes | exit |
| Depositor concentration | Severe | Yes | concentration |
| Operating | Low | Yes | consistency |
| Controller | Not read | No | who may move the money |
| Evidence | Not scored | No | 3 of 5 components read (45% of the weight) |
The levels come from this vault’s own risk components and controller reading. The bars draw them; they are not a second calculation, and there is deliberately no overall figure.
That is our coverage, not a finding.
Low observed risk is not zero risk. The overall band weighs every component together instead, so it can read better than this and is not in conflict with it: a dimension says how bad its worst reading is, the band says what the whole weighs.
It measures how much of the vault its largest depositor holds, not how much the vault lends into one market; that is the allocation table. The overall band weighs every component together instead, so it can read better than this and is not in conflict with it: a dimension says how bad its worst reading is, the band says what the whole weighs.
Unexamined is not acceptable, and this is not part of the overall band either way.
By weight, 37.5 of the 82.5 points that apply were read, which is 45% of the component weight the band could draw on (a different denominator: components are not equally weighted); the rest of the 100 is the weight of what does not apply. This is a statement about our coverage and carries no level of its own, because how much we could read is not a risk the vault runs.
Figures computed from the share price read from the vault contract as we went: 2026-09-08 to 2026-11-01, 56 observations. 30-day window from 2026-10-02. Readings from the share price read from the contract at past blocks, reconstructed afterwards (33) exist and are not mixed in: one series, one source.
$116,224 of this vault's $116,226 is not observed as lent, which does not exceed what the vault holds; that is a check that one figure does not contradict the other, not a reconciliation of the two. The two figures were read 44 minutes apart, not together, which is enough on its own to move a figure this size.
These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
| What does it depend on? | Lista Lending on BSCThe venue and the chain are known; what the strategy routes into underneath them has not been read. | Declared |
| Who can change it, and how fast? | —Access control has not been read for this vault. Who can move the money, and how quickly, is unknown. That is not the same as nobody being able to. | Not measured |
| How much of the above was measured? | 1 of 5 not measuredCounted from the rows above rather than asserted. Every figure on this page carries when it was read and what it was read from; the gaps are listed on /reconciliation with their size. | Measured |
This is not a score and there is no letter at the end of it: the answers are different kinds of thing and compressing them into one number would hide exactly the part a reader needs. Where we have nothing, the row says so.
The mark says where an answer came from, never whether it is good: a filled circle is a reading we made, a half circle an inference from readings we hold, quotation marks what the venue or operator states, and a dashed ring means we did not read it rather than that there is nothing to read.
Nothing here is a rating, a recommendation, or a statement that this vault is safe.
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them.
An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact, and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.
2 markets read, $116.2k attributed. 2 did not publish a loan-to-value, shown as a dash rather than as zero. The market by market rows, and this vault’s share of each, are part of the crowding data.