ASPERN · due-diligence report
Lagoon · ROCKUSDM
Lagoon · ethereum · lagoon-rockusdm-0f32f9
Generated 2026-10-15 18:17:36 UTC. Every figure below carries the moment it was read, because a report is read later than it is made. Nothing here is a recommendation to invest. The live page carries the same readings and moves with them.
What it holds
How you get out
Getting out is a REQUEST, not a withdrawal: the contract takes an ERC-7540 redeem request and pays it when it settles. It names no period, so how long settlement takes is the operator’s to decide and we cannot read it. The contract will also tell you where you stand: it answers what of yours is still pending and what has settled and is waiting to be claimed. A liquidity figure does not answer this question.
Six risks, read separately
| Market | low | in the band |
| Liquidity | low | in the band |
| Concentration | low | in the band |
| Operating | low | in the band |
| Controller | not read | outside the band |
| Evidence | not read | outside the band |
There is no overall figure and there will not be one. The band covers four of these and contains no reading of the controller at all, so a band of `low` beside a controller of `high` is not a contradiction: it is the thing this table exists to show.
What it advertised and what it returned
The published ratio divides the realised rate by the rate this vault quotes TODAY. Over 26 of the 174 days the return covers we hold its own quotes, it advertised between 3.17% and 3.17%, averaging 3.17%, and today's quote is an ordinary one for this vault. Against the average it quoted, the realised rate is 30.35% of it. We hold no quote for the rest of the window, so this says what the venue was advertising while we watched and not across the whole return.
What we cannot see
- · The risk band rests on 76% of its components; the rest could not be measured for this vault.
- · Whether it still takes deposits is not something we could establish.
- · Who can move the money: we have not read this vault’s owner, curator or controller on chain, so nothing here says whether one key could empty it.