Loading
Gold Finger: AI Trading System
BpossibleLet our AI trading system maximize your profits. We exclusively trade BTC-USDC with 2x leverage on perpetuals.
One thing worth a look
Patterns in this vault’s record that have more than one explanation. None of them lowers its grade and none of them is a finding of wrongdoing — a ledger cannot separate the readings below, and neither can we.
- The operator holds 100% of this vault themselves.
- Equally consistent with: A manager with their own money at risk, which is usually a good sign. It does mean the return is a personal account’s, not a record of managing anyone else’s.
Measured over the last 30 days, as of 2026-08-24 17:53Z. A pattern that stops is cleared rather than left standing.
Taking money
Open
TVL
$32.3k
Return
43.9%
over observed history
Recent
—
30d · 90d
Max drawdown
6.7%
peak to trough
Sortino
—
return per unit of downside risk
History
7d
730 observations
Confidence
2%
in these metrics
Value and drawdown
Range
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Passport
Identity
Vault contract0x48d3faa8…e219
Network
Hyperliquid
PlatformHyperliquid
OperatorGold Finger0xa215071c…944b
Deposit assetUSDC
Created on-chain2026-04-01
First observed by us2026-08-11
Statuslive
What is deciding
unregisteredStrategy versionNot attested — the operator has not bound this record to a specific version
Model providerNot attested — no model declared
ModelNot attested — no model declared
System prompt hashNot attested — no prompt commitment
Policy hashNot attested — no policy commitment
Inferred modemodel assisted (52% confidence)
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them. An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact — and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.
How much to trust this
Provenance gradeBReal capital, readable at the venue — but the operator’s full cohort is unproven.
Machine-managedyes (35% confidence)
Evidence
- name_signal Name contains autonomy signal: ai
Metric confidence2%66 observations over 7 days
RankingNot ranked — insufficient history
Alignment and capacity
Operator’s own share100.0%
Commission10%
Depositor wallets4
Concentration1.00 · largest holder 100%
Estimated capacity$1.15M ($576.1k–$2.30M)
Net flow 30d$0.00
Where the return came from
Costs consumed 7% of gross profitGross realised$6.0k
Trading fees−$411.26
Funding paid−$38.59
Net realised$5.6k
Unrealised$2.3k
Total$7.9k
That is 24.51% on the capital the strategy currently runs.
- Slippage is not separated: without a book snapshot at fill time it cannot be measured, so it remains inside gross rather than being estimated.
- Funding is differenced across position snapshots, so it is a flow over the window rather than a level: it counts what changed hands while we were watching and nothing before that. Intervals where a position closed and reopened are refused rather than guessed, which makes the figure a floor.
Computed from 96 recorded fills and the funding on currently open positions. It covers the window we have observed, not the vault’s whole life.
How well it executes
from 96 fills over 87.67 daysTaker share 100% by value
Fee rate 4.5bps
Daily turnover $10.4k
Annual fee drag 5.3%
- · Almost entirely taker flow: this strategy pays the spread on nearly every trade, so its edge has to clear that first.
How this vault behaves
from 96 fills over 87.67 daysTiming indicates model assisted management, confidence 52%.
- · No strong automation signature in the timing.
Overnight activity 33%
Hour-of-day evenness 69%
Cadence regularity 11%
Clock alignment 0%
Fills per day 1.1
Instruments 1
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good — a losing bot is still a bot.
Nearest liquidation
Get told when this changesBTC falls 51.7% to 38,196.24 — from 79,023 now.
That is the nearest single instrument breaching this account’s maintenance requirement, so it is a ceiling on safety: a market-wide move hits every leg at once and arrives sooner. Computed from the venue’s own margin state at 2026-08-24 19:01Z.
Current exposure
1 positions · $62.2k gross · 1.9x the vault's capital| Instrument | Side | Notional | Share | Entry | Unrealised | Leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | long | $62.2k | 100% | 76040 | $2.3k | 2x |
Snapshot taken 2026-08-24 19:01 UTC. A strategy that flips intraday can look flat at every snapshot and still carry risk in between. Click an instrument to see every other vault holding it.
How the capacity estimate was reached
- Impact is inferred from this strategy’s own realised cost, not measured against a book.
- A 10% participation ceiling is applied where venue volume is known.
- Trade size is converted to capital using the strategy’s own capital-to-trade-size ratio.
- Capacity is capped at 50× the largest trade actually observed — beyond that we are extrapolating.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | 56.8bps | 100% | $4.8k | Edge 56.8bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
Who is in it
as at 2026-08-24 01:27Largest wallet
100.0%
Top five
100.0%
Concentration
1.000
Wallets seen
4
| # | Wallet | Deposited | Share | All-time P&L | In for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leader | $31.2k | 100.0% | $4.2k | 144d |
| 2 | 0x8ec2d3b7…b209 | $0.00 | 0.0% | $0.48 | 60d |
| 3 | 0xbb6847be…010b | $0.00 | 0.0% | $9.64 | 128d |
| 4 | 0xa63bca4a…5c7e | $0.00 | 0.0% | -$0.84 | 54d |
Shares are of the capital we can observe, not of reported TVL ($32.3k) — dividing by a total that includes wallets outside our sample would understate every share and make concentration look better than it is.
Money in and out
Ledger read 22 hours agoIn
$29.6k
17 deposits
Out
$0.00
0 withdrawals
Net
$29.6k
91.8% of TVL
Window
90d
last 17 movements
| When | Type | Amount | Of vault | Transaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-03 20:29 | deposit | $13.38 | 0.04% | 0xa16f0948…5ed1 |
| 2026-07-03 04:14 | deposit | $5.14 | 0.02% | 0x23bda6dc…d2e0 |
| 2026-07-02 19:27 | deposit | $15.20 | 0.05% | 0x84dc949f…f340 |
| 2026-07-02 00:37 | deposit | $12.63 | 0.04% | 0xdd81d92b…593e |
| 2026-07-01 18:41 | deposit | $6.44 | 0.02% | 0x1b029919…f9bc |
| 2026-07-01 00:22 | deposit | $13.23 | 0.04% | 0xf2ba9ee2…5d31 |
| 2026-06-30 17:41 | deposit | $6.47 | 0.02% | 0x86ce3353…5e34 |
| 2026-06-29 17:36 | deposit | $6.62 | 0.02% | 0xa508c995…e080 |
| 2026-06-28 16:33 | deposit | $10.83 | 0.03% | 0x43f63dce…353e |
| 2026-06-27 15:33 | deposit | $10.76 | 0.03% | 0x8bfd0dc7…57c9 |
| 2026-06-26 09:26 | deposit | $10.92 | 0.03% | 0x8cef64c6…258d |
| 2026-06-24 14:55 | deposit | $11.19 | 0.03% | 0xd066ca08…03c1 |
| 2026-06-04 19:12 | deposit | $20.0k | 61.93% | 0x6c5a7e18…69af |
| 2026-04-17 05:41 | deposit | $290.00 | 0.90% | 0x25fe5e5b…964d |
| 2026-04-17 05:15 | deposit | $10.00 | 0.03% | 0xc8d37813…93ce |
| 2026-04-10 21:57 | deposit | $9.2k | 28.55% | 0xc699dfe2…0510 |
| 2026-04-04 08:51 | deposit | $7.64 | 0.02% | 0x04230c62…8f85 |
Shares are against the vault’s current size, so an old movement is measured against today rather than against what the vault was then. It is the comparison a reader wants — how much of this vault that was — and it is not the same as the share it represented at the time.
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.