Loading
All vaultsThis is my vault, register it
Genesis Algo 88 | BABYSATOSHI
BAlgorithmic trading vault using rule-based strategies on high-liquidity perp markets. Entries, exits, and risk are managed by the algo, not emotions. Aiming for long-term growth, but performance is not guaranteed. Only deposit what you can risk.
Taking money
Open
TVL
$2.2k
Return
—
over its watched history, read on 82 of 297 days, thin enough that the figure is an estimate between readings
The venue advertises
-93.5%
a year, on their own figures
Recent
—
30d · 90d
Max drawdown
—
a floor, read on 82 of 297 days
Sortino
—
return per unit of downside risk
Volatility
—
annualised, from daily returns
History
297d
799 readings, all taken at the time
Record begins
2026-09-03
began 2025-12-07, so 270 days of it are before anything here
Record rests on
Grade B
The whole record is grade B.
Confidence
81%
in these metrics
Value and drawdown
This chart shows the last 30 days of a 298 day record; the whole-record figures on this page are measured over all of it, and the 30, 90 and 365-day figures over their own windows, dated below. The rest is the Analyst tierRange
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
The rate, and the seven things that qualify it
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict. These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
- Current quoted rate
- -93.5%As the venue states it, from Hyperliquid. Passed on rather than adopted, and whether rewards are inside it is the next row.
- Rewards inside that rate
- No reward rate is published, so we cannot say whether the quote includes one.A published rate, not a verified payment. Promotional projections and amounts actually accrued are different things and this is the first.
- Realised return
- Too little share-price history to derive one. The quote stands alone until there is.Derived from the share price we read, over the window stated. Annualisation is secondary: the window is the measurement.
- Fee basis
- We do not read this vault’s share price, so we cannot say which fees the figure is net of.A return derived from the share price is net of whatever the venue already deducted. Fees charged outside it are not in either number.
- Withdrawable now
- The venue publishes no withdrawable figure, so no amount is claimed either way.A reading of now, not a promise about the day somebody tries. An accruing rate with nothing withdrawable is the case this section exists for.
- History quality
Profit, and what the value is made of
Value held less cumulative profit is the money people put in. The venue draws the two apart; the gap is the point.Range
Profit and loss since the vault opened, as the venue reports it. It ignores deposits and withdrawals: only trading moves this line.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Passport
Identity
Vault contract
0xa33ab376…2d69
NetworkHyperliquid
Platform
Hyperliquid
OperatorGenesis Algo 880x55c522d1…777e
Deposit assetUSDC
Where the return came from
Costs consumed 65% of gross profitGross realised$13.9k
Trading fees−$9.0k
Funding paid−$13.94
Net realised$4.9k
Unrealised−$1.3k
Total$3.6k
That is 165.51% on the capital the strategy currently runs.
- Slippage is not separated: without a book snapshot at fill time it cannot be measured, so it remains inside gross rather than being estimated.
- Funding is differenced across position snapshots, so it is a flow over the window rather than a level: it counts what changed hands while we were watching and nothing before that. Intervals where a position closed and reopened are refused rather than guessed, which makes the figure a floor.
Paid to trade. Earned by trading, after paying $14 of funding to hold the position.
Computed from 9,239 fills over the 6d in which funding could also be measured, so every part is taken from the same days. That window opens when we started watching, not when the vault started trading. Measured by differencing 27 snapshot intervals over 6.3 days. 22 of 49 intervals were not attributable, a position closed and reopened, or a snapshot was missed, so this is a floor.
Analyst tier
Detail is hidden, not absentHow well it executes
Built from 14,544 individual fills. Two strategies with identical signals can differ by hundreds of basis points purely in how they get filled, taker share, fee rate, slippage. This is the part of a result that is operational competence rather than market view, and it is what tells you whether a good year was skill or a good venue.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inHow this vault behaves
from 3,000 fills over 2.21 daysTiming indicates model assisted management, confidence 66%.
- · 1356.7 fills per day, beyond sustained manual trading.
Overnight activity 2%
Hour-of-day evenness 78%
Cadence regularity 0%
Clock alignment 24%
Fills per day 1356.7
Instruments 4
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good, a losing bot is still a bot.
Nearest liquidation, as the venue reports it
SOL rises 1.9% to 104.0369, from 102.1 now.
Leverage 20.0× weighted by size, a liquidation starts at the second number, not the first.
The closest liquidation is 1.9% away at the venue's own reported price. Weighted leverage is 20.0×.
Nearest liquidation
SOL rises 1.9% to 104.0369, from 102.1 now.
That is the nearest single instrument breaching this account’s maintenance requirement, so it is a ceiling on safety: a market-wide move hits every leg at once and arrives sooner. Computed from the venue’s own margin state at 2026-09-14 15:52 UTC.
Current exposure
1 positions · $197.1k gross · 90.5x the vault's capital| Instrument | Side | Notional | Share | Entry | Unrealised |
|---|
How the capacity estimate was reached
- No instrument showed a positive edge against its realised cost.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOL | -1.4bps | 100% | $2.2k | No positive edge observed, capacity is not the binding constraint here. |
| PUMP | -5.4bps | 100% | $500.00 | No positive edge observed, capacity is not the binding constraint here. |
| ZEC | -36.8bps | 100% | $1.4k | No positive edge observed, capacity is not the binding constraint here. |
| HYPE | -10.3bps | 100% | $1.4k | No positive edge observed, capacity is not the binding constraint here. |
Who is in it
Money in and out
Ledger read 21 days agoAnalyst tier
Detail is hidden, not absentWho is in this vault, and how much of it is one wallet
A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it. Concentration is the risk a return figure never shows, and it moves before the return line does.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inWhat changed the value
8 days decomposedThe section above says money moved. This says what the movement WAS. A vault grows because deposits arrived, or because the trading worked, or because it was paid to hold a position, and a size figure renders all three identically.
| Money in and outdeposits less withdrawals, and arriving is not earning | $0 |
| Closed tradesrealised on the fills the venue reports | $7,698 |
| Feespaid to the venue on those fills | −$10,041 |
| Fundingpaid or received for holding the positions, from the venue's own ledger | $77 |
| Open positions movedchange in unrealised profit on what was still open | $808 |
| Not explainedwhat the terms above do not account for, 0.6% of the $31,022 that moved | $175 |
| Change in value$16,195 to $9,555, 2026-09-04 to 2026-09-13 | −$6,640 |
Performance, which is the change less what arrived and left, is −$6,640 over days and fills.
The shape of the record
280 completed round tripsRebuilt from the venue’s own open and close labels on every fill. A return figure cannot say whether it came from being right often and small or rarely and large, and those are opposite businesses.
Win rate
34%
Payoff
1.29
Profit factor
0.65
Median hold
30m
280 round trips, 34% of them profitable, holding a median 30 minutes. Average win $551, average loss $427.
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.