Loading
dYdX
their siteEverything read on this venue, and what has not been. Figures are ours unless a line says a venue reported them.
Market by market, underneath the vault
268 books · 24,120 daily readingsThe protocol runs a separate book per market. This is where its market-making works and where it does not, a question the headline vault figure cannot answer either way.
138
markets losing money
lifetime PnL below zero
117
markets making it
lifetime PnL above zero
$286.1k
left in the books
across all of them
$52.96M
open interest
73 active markets
Losing most
| Market | Lifetime PnL | Left in it |
|---|---|---|
| DMAIL-USD | -$389.0k | $0.00 |
| ZEN-USD | -$292.4k | $0.00 |
| JTO-USD | -$258.7k | $1.2k |
| ADA-USD | -$245.0k | $3.6k |
| TON-USD | -$196.3k | $1.5k |
| DOGE-USD | -$187.2k | $2.1k |
| WLD-USD | -$186.4k | $1.5k |
| XRP-USD | -$177.8k | $4.9k |
Making most
| Market | Lifetime PnL | Left in it |
|---|---|---|
| IP-USD | $362.3k | $1.2k |
| ZEREBRO-USD | $357.4k | $0.00 |
| TAO-USD | $112.1k | $1.4k |
| AXL-USD | $98.6k | $1.5k |
| AI16Z-USD | $97.7k | $4.1k |
| ONDO-USD | $87.4k | $1.4k |
| AKT-USD | $84.8k | $1.6k |
| VIRTUAL-USD | $70.1k | $1.3k |
These do not add up to the vault’s own figure. Per-market PnL sums to a different figure from the MegaVault total. The two are not the same accounting and are never added together. MegaVault reports $4.69M lifetime against -$3.39M summed here.
No dYdX account here is attributable to an agent. dYdX accounts are Cosmos addresses. No declaration, registry or rail we read carries one, so no dYdX account is attributable to an agent yet. The reader has been exercised against live accounts and reads subaccounts, fills, transfers and profit history, so the day a declaration carries a dydx1 address it is read from that day. An address the venue says has never opened a subaccount is recorded as that, which is a reading rather than a gap. Measured rather than assumed: 0 of 607,282 identity records name a dydx1 address. Its public trade feed carries no addresses at all, only side, size and price, so accounts cannot be enumerated from activity either. Attribution needs a declared address, and the reader for it is built and waiting.
Capital
$1.74M
1 open vault
Readable from a network
0.0%
0 of 1 vaults have a contract address; 1 holding $1.74M do not
Agent-managed
0
of 1 vaults · 0 carry a risk score
Movements read
none read yet
we hold vaults here and have read no movement
Has this venue been seen acting?
Users act on every vault. Whether the vault acts, moving assets when nobody deposited or withdrew, is a separate reading, and it is what separates a managed strategy from a container.
Not read yet. We have this venue’s deposits and withdrawals, which are things done to a vault; what its manager does has not been looked at. That is a gap in our reading and not a finding about the venue.
Who manages the capital
How much of the capital on dYdX sits under a vault an agent runs, and what stands behind each answer.
$0 of $1.7M is under a vault we have reason to call agent-managed; 0.0% of the capital, in 0 of 1 vaults.
| Who can move it | Capital | Share | Vaults |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not agent-managed | $1.7M | 100.0% | 1 vault |
Each vault counts in one band only, its strongest evidence, hover a band for what stands behind it.
Where it lives
| Network | Vaults | Capital | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $1.74M | 100.0% |
What it holds
The underlying asset each vault reports. ‘Not read’ is a vault whose asset we have not established, which is different from one holding nothing.
| Asset | Vaults | Capital |
|---|---|---|
| not read | 1 | $1.74M |
Largest vaults
| Vault | Network | Capital | APY | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dYdXdYdX MegaVaultno contract address | $1.74M | — | — |
What we can and cannot say here
MegaVault only. Individual trader accounts are Cosmos addresses and none is attributable to an agent we track.
Capital and yield are as the venue or an aggregator reports them unless a vault’s own page says it was read from the contract. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and a venue appearing here is not an endorsement of it.