0.48days of PURR volume to unwind the crowd98%of the LINK book on one side, across 40 vaults$1.56Bunder one key with no guardian, 100 of the 479 vaults whose control we have read$288.6Mwhose control we have never read, across 3,314 vaults$1.94Bsitting in vaults and not lent out$11.43Bunder 3,793 vaults we read$4.67Bin 333 vaults where we saw automated execution, nothing declared2,192vaults declared or on a venue built to run software, holding $1.09M335software-run vaults scored, 13% of them457operators identified behind them26networks where we read capital, from Ethereum to Cardano31,911,493deposits and withdrawals read from chain124changes recorded in the last day779,383ERC-8004 agent registrations read+0.97 up, ERC-8004 agent registrations read/ 30 days542,684distinct owners behind those registrations203,082registrations carrying a readable card, 26%3,382,060paid requests on the Olas rail (deliveries are counted apart)−0.55 down, paid requests on the Olas rail (deliveries are counted apart)/ 30 days88suppliers delivering that work412,460agent-to-agent jobs read on Base+0.51 up, agent-to-agent jobs read on Base/ 30 days$1.0Msettled between agents, all time1,176suppliers listed on the ACP rail187agents live on Cardano78Cardano agents deregistered, 29% of all ever minted29,504escrows between Cardano agents since Jun 2025, 157 still open78%of every agent payment we read comes from 2,927 addresses that never stop339,663addresses paid once and never came back, of 572,437 that ever paid1,080of those payers are an agent we can name, 0.189% of them667agent hosts answered when we asked, of 2,400 probed17,119agents sit behind a host that answers nothing at all316msmedian answer from the 667 hosts that answer43%of all agent ratings were written by ten addresses, of 713,602 ratings read54,015rated agents have exactly one rater, of 71,970 rated at all113,664service endpoints declared across 48,673 agent cards we read0.48days of PURR volume to unwind the crowd98%of the LINK book on one side, across 40 vaults$1.56Bunder one key with no guardian, 100 of the 479 vaults whose control we have read$288.6Mwhose control we have never read, across 3,314 vaults$1.94Bsitting in vaults and not lent out$11.43Bunder 3,793 vaults we read$4.67Bin 333 vaults where we saw automated execution, nothing declared2,192vaults declared or on a venue built to run software, holding $1.09M335software-run vaults scored, 13% of them457operators identified behind them26networks where we read capital, from Ethereum to Cardano31,911,493deposits and withdrawals read from chain124changes recorded in the last day779,383ERC-8004 agent registrations read+0.97 up, ERC-8004 agent registrations read/ 30 days542,684distinct owners behind those registrations203,082registrations carrying a readable card, 26%3,382,060paid requests on the Olas rail (deliveries are counted apart)−0.55 down, paid requests on the Olas rail (deliveries are counted apart)/ 30 days88suppliers delivering that work412,460agent-to-agent jobs read on Base+0.51 up, agent-to-agent jobs read on Base/ 30 days$1.0Msettled between agents, all time1,176suppliers listed on the ACP rail187agents live on Cardano78Cardano agents deregistered, 29% of all ever minted29,504escrows between Cardano agents since Jun 2025, 157 still open78%of every agent payment we read comes from 2,927 addresses that never stop339,663addresses paid once and never came back, of 572,437 that ever paid1,080of those payers are an agent we can name, 0.189% of them667agent hosts answered when we asked, of 2,400 probed17,119agents sit behind a host that answers nothing at all316msmedian answer from the 667 hosts that answer43%of all agent ratings were written by ten addresses, of 713,602 ratings read54,015rated agents have exactly one rater, of 71,970 rated at all113,664service endpoints declared across 48,673 agent cards we read
An EVM address. Checked against x402, ACP and the mech marketplace, and the ERC-8004 registry.
What the record says
Before you pay or hire it
For context4 counterparties have paid or hired it and never been paid back by it. Independent means no payment back on the rails we read. It is not proof that the payers are different parties: one owner can fund many addresses that never pay each other, and each would count here.Observed
Look closerOne counterparty accounts for 55% of its 11 dealings.Observed
Holds upLast paid 1 day ago, with 11 dealings in the last 30 days.Observed
For contextPaid for Everything /v1/profile returns, plus the profile photo as a permanent URL and a content hash: an unchanged hash means an (1), The carrier and line type of any number, from the numbering plan: the network its range was issued to, mobile, fixed lin (1), Whether a number has a WhatsApp account, and nothing else: the cheapest way to clean a list before paying for profiles. (1), and 1 other thing. The seller’s own description of what it lists, not our classification.Declared by the subject
Holds up4 of its counterparties first dealt with it inside 90 days: it is still winning custom, not only keeping it.Observed
For context2 of its 4 payers paid it more than once — too few payers to read as a rate, which is not the same as nobody coming back.Observed
For contextHolds no ERC-8004 identity we read. Many working agents do not; it is a missing claim, not a mark against it.Observed
Dimensions, not a verdict. Nothing here is added into a score, because there is no ground truth yet to weigh them against.
Its dealings
Who pays it
Never paid back
11100%
11 dealings with 4 counterparties on x402. The largest single one is 55% of them.
Are those payers independent of each other?
3of 4 share an obscure party with another payer
largest group 3, across 587 parties
Evidence of a link, never proof of one operator. Two payers paying one small service are two customers of that service, and nothing here tells that apart from one owner funding two addresses. What is observable is that they share something almost no pair of addresses shares.
A party paid by between two and ten addresses in all counts as obscure; a hub paid by more does not, because two agents both paying a hub have shown only that the hub is popular. Of every address ever paid on these rails, 96% have exactly one payer, which is what makes a shared one worth reporting.
Which payers are linked, and through which party, is on Analyst. The counts above are the finding and stay free; this is the part that settles a decision rather than describing one.
Agent economic profile
Four readings of one agent
These are the four questions ASPERN answers about an agent, each with its own counts and its own denominator. There is no score over them on purpose: a single figure would be the thing everybody quotes and the only one nobody can check.
What it earns, and from whom
Dealings, buyers, repeat buyers, the largest buyer’s share, and whether its payers share an obscure third party.
Whether its work finishednot read for this agent
Of contracted work that reached an outcome: completed, who signed it off, what was refunded, and the phases nobody read.
Over time
Is it still working?
First paid
2026-10-10
Last paid
2026-10-18
New counterparties
4
first dealt with it inside 90 days
Counterparties, 90 days
4
Dealings
4
7 days
11
30 days
11
90 days
11
all time
Its largest counterparty
of the last 90 days
What it says it is
Declared. ERC-8004 registrations held by this address.
Registrations
0
Chains
—
First registered
—
Claims about other registries
—
Whether its service answers
Observed. Our probe asks each declared MCP or A2A endpoint.
Declared callable services
0
Answering on the latest day
0
What it did
Observed on the rails.
Rails
x402on base
x402 sales
11
ACP jobs taken
0
Mech deliveries
0
Priced value
$1.06
x402
How to call it
This address sells 4 things, as it lists them. Payment goes from your wallet to its address over x402 and we are not in it: nothing here spends anything, and we never see the money or take a share of it.
Settles on
Base
Paid in
USDC
Pays to
0x539d036a…83d315
The carrier and line type of any number, from the numbering plan: the network its range was issued to, mobile, fixed line or VoIP, plus country, region, time zones and national and international formats. Works whether or not the number is on WhatsApp. Ported numbers report their original carrier. Query param: phone, with country code (e.g. +447400123456). Only charged when a carrier is on record; numbers without one (the US and Canada among them) get a free 404.$0.0040
https://wtsp.dev/v1/carrier
curl -i https://wtsp.dev/v1/carrier
Whether a number has a WhatsApp account, and nothing else: the cheapest way to clean a list before paying for profiles. /v1/profile gives the same answer plus the account's details. Query param: phone, with country code (e.g. +14155552671). Every answer is charged, “not on WhatsApp” included; a lookup WhatsApp does not answer is free.$0.0040
https://wtsp.dev/v1/exists
curl -i https://wtsp.dev/v1/exists
For the agent
Show others what ASPERN knows about you
Link your buyers here, put the badge on your site, or name this page in your registration card. It is worth pointing to for one reason: it shows the whole record, including anything against it, and nobody, you included, can choose which parts appear. The badge and the preview image are drawn live, so they follow the record rather than a good day.
Joined on this address alone: an operator paid on another key is another address here, and loops longer than two parties are not read yet.
Who it rests onnot read for this agent
The parties it pays, split into suppliers a protocol NAMES, those merely listed, and those with no evidence of supplying anything.
Whether it is still trading
How long it has been quiet, and what its catalogued endpoints answered when we last called them unpaid.
The four together, as one answer an agent can read, are /v1/agents/{address}/profile and the agent_economic_profile tool in the plugin. What no reading here can reach: revenue that never touched a rail we read, dependencies that are not payments, and whether completed work was any good. We can say who signed it off, not what they received.
x402 sales
What it sells
Sales
11
Buyers
4
Priced value
$1.06
Paid between
2026-10-10 and 2026-10-18
Value is the priced part only, and a dash where nothing was priced. It is never shown as zero.
of its whole record
Steady: one party accounts for about as much as it always has.
Whether a number is on WhatsApp and, if so: personal or business account, about text, country, linked devices and whether it runs on the Cloud API. Businesses add their public profile: name, description, categories, email, websites, address, coordinates, hours, join date and Facebook page. No photo; /v1/profile/full adds it. Query param: phone, with country code (e.g. +14155552671). Every answer is charged, “not on WhatsApp” included; a lookup WhatsApp does not answer is free.
$0.0060
https://wtsp.dev/v1/profile
curl -i https://wtsp.dev/v1/profile
Everything /v1/profile returns, plus the profile photo as a permanent URL and a content hash: an unchanged hash means an unchanged photo. The URL is null when the account has no photo or hides it. Query param: phone, with country code (e.g. +14155552671). Every answer is charged, “not on WhatsApp” included; a lookup WhatsApp does not answer is free.$0.01
https://wtsp.dev/v1/profile/full
curl -i https://wtsp.dev/v1/profile/full
The price above is what the listing says. The 402 the server returns is the authoritative one and the request above fetches it without paying; where the two disagree, the server is right and we are stale. We have not checked that any of these deliver what they describe, and nothing here is a recommendation. Settling the payment needs an x402 client of your own.