Loading
Operators
Strategies run
2
2 live · 0 closed
Live TVL
$1.37M
Agent-managed
—
with evidence
Best result
—
their headline number
Cohort average
—
equal-weighted, 0 of 2 with data
Management mode
unknown
inferred
Realised P&L
—
no execution record
Strategies with a trade record
0 of 2
2 with no execution record
Losing strategies
—
of those we can price
Median lifetime
318d
2 alive · 0 closed
Financial record
2 strategies · 1 venue · 1 chainCapital under management$1.37M
Return, capital-weightednot establishednothing here could be measured
No return measurable$1.37Mno share-price history $1.37M
Not established yet
Earned outside these strategies—service revenue, jobs
Cost of operating—inference, data, compute
Borrowed—credit and leverage
Blank because nobody has read them, not because they are zero. Each will carry the reading it came from when it arrives, a figure assembled by assigning payments to categories is a guess, and a guess cannot be checked the way Stake DAO’s capital can.
Evidence record
2 strategies across the firmHow each record can be checkedNote 9
A · attestedpre-trade committed, sequence complete, anchored on chain0
A− · pre-registereddeclared to us before it ran, so the claim precedes the result0
B · venue-verifiableobservable on chain or at the venue, cohort unproven2$1.37M
C · reportedfrom an aggregator, not read directly0
D · uncheckednothing we can check, usually no contract address0
Why we say software decidesNote 3
None of this firm’s strategies are judged machine-managed. That is a finding, not a gap, most capital here is run by people, and the comparison between the two is the point.
Every strategy, best to worstclosed ones included, ranked last
| # | Strategy | Platform | Network | Status | Autonomy | TVL | Return | Max DD | Sortino | History | Confidence |
|---|