Registrations whose on-chain card declares an endpoint on this host. Declared, not called: we record that somebody wrote it down, and nothing here says the host answers.
This host reads as a service several parties chose. The largest holder has 84 of them, 9% of the registrations here. None of this is an accusation: running many agents from one deployment is a reasonable thing to do, and the point is only that the count of registrations is not a count of parties.
This host
One deployment can register the same agent on several chains, so a host spread across chains is one party as easily as many.
The addresses that own the registrations declaring this host, largest first. An address is the only thing in a registry that can be counted honestly: names, endpoints and descriptions are all free to write.
| Holder | Registrations | Share | Networks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0xde152afb…d336 | 84 | 9% | |
| 0xbbb9d1d1…8a02 | 53 | 6% | |
| 18 | 2% |
Three of 579 holders shown. The rest are on a plan, because naming every address behind a third party is the part somebody pays for.