Loading
ImpulseX
BFor investors seeking short-term directional exposure to bitcoin with disciplined risk control, defined trading periods, and a data-driven momentum approach.
Taking money
Closed
not accepting deposits
TVL
$45.8k
Return
0.0%
over observed history
Recent
—
30d · 90d
Max drawdown
0.0%
peak to trough
Sortino
—
return per unit of downside risk
History
7d
803 observations
Confidence
2%
in these metrics
Value and drawdown
Range
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Passport
Identity
Vault contract0x2e161982…3347
Network
Hyperliquid
PlatformHyperliquid
OperatorImpulseX0xf1814754…c41b
Deposit assetUSDC
Created on-chain2025-11-30
First observed by us2026-08-11
Statuslive
What is deciding
unregisteredStrategy versionNot attested — the operator has not bound this record to a specific version
Model providerNot attested — no model declared
ModelNot attested — no model declared
System prompt hashNot attested — no prompt commitment
Policy hashNot attested — no policy commitment
Inferred modemodel assisted (92% confidence)
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them. An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact — and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.
How much to trust this
Provenance gradeBReal capital, readable at the venue — but the operator’s full cohort is unproven.
Machine-managedNot established
Metric confidence2%65 observations over 7 days
RankingNot ranked — insufficient history
Alignment and capacity
Operator’s own share5.1%
Commission10%
Depositor wallets3
Concentration0.90 · largest holder 95%
Estimated capacity$2.29M ($1.15M–$4.58M) · floor
Net flow 30d$0.00
Where the return came from
Costs consumed 5% of gross profitGross realised$5.6k
Trading fees−$266.00
Net realised$5.3k
That is 11.67% on the capital the strategy currently runs.
- Slippage is not separated: without a book snapshot at fill time it cannot be measured, so it remains inside gross rather than being estimated.
- Funding is differenced across position snapshots, so it is a flow over the window rather than a level: it counts what changed hands while we were watching and nothing before that. Intervals where a position closed and reopened are refused rather than guessed, which makes the figure a floor.
Computed from 431 recorded fills and the funding on currently open positions. It covers the window we have observed, not the vault’s whole life.
How well it executes
from 431 fills over 66.55 daysTaker share 7% by value
Fee rate 1.72bps
Daily turnover $23.2k
Annual fee drag 3.2%
- · Predominantly maker flow: the strategy earns the spread rather than paying it, which lowers its cost floor considerably.
How this vault behaves
from 431 fills over 66.55 daysTiming indicates model assisted management, confidence 92%.
- · No strong automation signature in the timing.
Overnight activity 48%
Hour-of-day evenness 87%
Cadence regularity 0%
Clock alignment 30%
Fills per day 6.5
Instruments 1
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good — a losing bot is still a bot.
How the capacity estimate was reached
- Impact is inferred from this strategy’s own realised cost, not measured against a book.
- A 10% participation ceiling is applied where venue volume is known.
- Trade size is converted to capital using the strategy’s own capital-to-trade-size ratio.
- Capacity is capped at 50× the largest trade actually observed — beyond that we are extrapolating.
- Capped at 50x current capital; beyond that the estimate is unfalsifiable.
- At least one instrument hit the observed-size cap, so the total is a floor rather than an estimate.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | 32.9bps | 5% | $320.00 | Edge 32.9bps against 2.0bps of realised cost. |
Who is in it
as at 2026-08-24 01:27Largest wallet
94.9%
Top five
100.0%
Concentration
0.903
Wallets seen
3
| # | Wallet | Deposited | Share | All-time P&L | In for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0x14e1b60d…c71a | $43.5k | 94.9% | $2.3k | 265d |
| 2 | Leader | $2.3k | 5.1% | -$154.11 | 266d |
| 3 | 0xc4062cdb…5b53 | $0.00 | 0.0% | -$2.09 | 197d |
Shares are of the capital we can observe, not of reported TVL ($45.8k) — dividing by a total that includes wallets outside our sample would understate every share and make concentration look better than it is.
Money in and out
Ledger read 23 hours agoIn
$43.6k
10 deposits
Out
$0.00
0 withdrawals
Net
$43.6k
95.1% of TVL
Window
69d
last 10 movements
| When | Type | Amount | Of vault | Transaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-07 21:37 | deposit | $100.00 | 0.22% | 0x349b70e7…e12a |
| 2026-01-14 17:34 | deposit | $10.8k | 23.49% | 0x2573541b…cead |
| 2026-01-14 17:25 | deposit | $1.0k | 2.18% | 0xe3bc92f2…2023 |
| 2026-01-06 08:46 | deposit | $100.00 | 0.22% | 0xd5570fdb…11a0 |
| 2025-12-30 16:02 | deposit | $10.00 | 0.02% | 0xe41aaf8e…8a4c |
| 2025-12-29 12:22 | deposit | $23.5k | 51.31% | 0xecdf59a4…5ca1 |
| 2025-12-23 14:15 | deposit | $3.5k | 7.62% | 0x5be9bc22…a7da |
| 2025-12-02 16:35 | deposit | $2.2k | 4.82% | 0x199010b5…6f9b |
| 2025-12-01 16:19 | deposit | $100.00 | 0.22% | 0xbc85a3a2…d890 |
| 2025-12-01 01:59 | deposit | $2.3k | 5.02% | 0x951550d3…9342 |
Shares are against the vault’s current size, so an old movement is measured against today rather than against what the vault was then. It is the comparison a reader wants — how much of this vault that was — and it is not the same as the share it represented at the time.
The shape of the record
33 completed round tripsRebuilt from the venue’s own open and close labels on every fill. A return figure cannot say whether it came from being right often and small or rarely and large, and those are opposite businesses.
Win rate
55%
Payoff
2.63
Profit factor
3.15
Median hold
2.9h
33 round trips, 55% of them profitable, holding a median 2.9 hours. Average win $413, average loss $157.
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.