Loading
Artemis II
BOne thing worth a look
Patterns in this vault’s record that have more than one explanation. None of them lowers its grade and none of them is a finding of wrongdoing — a ledger cannot separate the readings below, and neither can we.
- The operator holds 99% of this vault themselves.
- Equally consistent with: A manager with their own money at risk, which is usually a good sign. It does mean the return is a personal account’s, not a record of managing anyone else’s.
Measured over the last 30 days, as of 2026-08-24 17:53Z. A pattern that stops is cleared rather than left standing.
Taking money
—
TVL
$10.0k
Return
2.6%
over observed history
Recent
—
30d · 90d
Max drawdown
9.8%
the market did not share this one
Sortino
—
return per unit of downside risk
History
12d
183 observations
Confidence
3%
in these metrics
Value and drawdown
Range
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Passport
Identity
Vault contract0xc3237606…ac6d
Network
Hyperliquid
PlatformHyperliquid
OperatorArtemis0x0b6b3139…7b33
Deposit assetUSDC
Created on-chain2026-04-10
First observed by us2026-08-11
Statuslive
What is deciding
Where the return came from
Gross realised−$9.7k
Trading fees−$134.30
Net realised−$9.9k
Unrealised$16.07
Total−$9.9k
That is -98.41% on the capital the strategy currently runs.
- Slippage is not separated: without a book snapshot at fill time it cannot be measured, so it remains inside gross rather than being estimated.
- Funding is differenced across position snapshots, so it is a flow over the window rather than a level: it counts what changed hands while we were watching and nothing before that. Intervals where a position closed and reopened are refused rather than guessed, which makes the figure a floor.
- Gross realised PnL is not positive, so the cost ratio is not meaningful.
Computed from 203 recorded fills and the funding on currently open positions. It covers the window we have observed, not the vault’s whole life.
How well it executes
from 203 fills over 136.13 daysTaker share 100% by value
Fee rate 4.49bps
Daily turnover $2.2k
Annual fee drag 3.6%
- · Almost entirely taker flow: this strategy pays the spread on nearly every trade, so its edge has to clear that first.
How this vault behaves
from 203 fills over 136.13 daysTiming indicates discretionary management, confidence 64%.
- · No strong automation signature in the timing.
Overnight activity 0%
Hour-of-day evenness 55%
Cadence regularity 0%
Clock alignment 27%
Fills per day 1.5
Instruments 2
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good — a losing bot is still a bot.
Nearest liquidation
kPEPE rises 39.0% to 0.005595 — from 0.004025 now.
That is the nearest single instrument breaching this account’s maintenance requirement, so it is a ceiling on safety: a market-wide move hits every leg at once and arrives sooner. Computed from the venue’s own margin state at 2026-08-24 22:26Z.
Current exposure
1 positions · $8.1k gross · 0.8x the vault's capital| Instrument | Side | Notional | Share | Entry | Unrealised | Leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kPEPE | short | $8.1k | 100% | 0.004033 | $16.07 | 3x |
Snapshot taken 2026-08-24 22:26 UTC. A strategy that flips intraday can look flat at every snapshot and still carry risk in between. Click an instrument to see every other vault holding it.
How the capacity estimate was reached
- No instrument showed a positive edge against its realised cost.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETH | -344.3bps | 100% | $204.00 | No positive edge observed — capacity is not the binding constraint here. |
Who is in it
as at 2026-08-24 19:46Largest wallet
99.4%
Top five
100.0%
Concentration
0.989
Wallets seen
2
| # | Wallet | Deposited | Share | All-time P&L | In for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leader | $2.7k | 99.4% | -$9.5k | 136d |
| 2 | 0xa870f38c…a5bc | $15.14 | 0.6% | -$284.46 | 125d |
Money in and out
Ledger read 3 hours agoIn
$22.6k
16 deposits
Out
$0.00
0 withdrawals
Net
$22.6k
225.9% of TVL
Window
131d
last 16 movements
| When | Type | Amount | Of vault | Transaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-19 20:23 | deposit | $137.19 | 1.37% | 0x05614c7f…7f9e |
| 2026-08-08 22:47 | deposit | $999.80 |
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.