Loading
The advertised rate has been moving
Over 16 daily readings it has ranged from -15.78% to -5.78%, averaging -9.26%. The tile below shows today’s quote alone.
16 readings is 16 days, not a year. We began taking them on 2026-09-19 and this window grows with the record rather than standing in for a longer one.
[Bee] Line
Blikely#30 of 249Vault #1 from beehouse.ai
Taking money
Open
TVL
$10.4k
Return
20.9%
over its watched history
The venue advertises
-8.2%
the share price implies 110% over 29 days, from 1,009 readings
Recent
Value and drawdown
This chart shows the last 30 days of a 39 day record; the whole-record figures on this page are measured over all of it, and the 30, 90 and 365-day figures over their own windows, dated below. The rest is the Analyst tierRange
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
The rate, and the seven things that qualify it
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict. These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
- Current quoted rate
- -8.2%As the venue states it, from Hyperliquid. Passed on rather than adopted, and whether rewards are inside it is the next row.
- Rewards inside that rate
- No reward rate is published, so we cannot say whether the quote includes one.A published rate, not a verified payment. Promotional projections and amounts actually accrued are different things and this is the first.
- Realised return
- 110% over 29 daysDerived from the share price we read, over the window stated. Annualisation is secondary: the window is the measurement.
- Fee basis
- Already inside the share priceA return derived from the share price is net of whatever the venue already deducted. Fees charged outside it are not in either number.
- Withdrawable now
- The venue publishes no withdrawable figure, so no amount is claimed either way.A reading of now, not a promise about the day somebody tries. An accruing rate with nothing withdrawable is the case this section exists for.
- History quality
- 1,009 readingsHow many observations the derived figure rests on. A rate from three readings and one from three hundred are not the same claim.
Profit, and what the value is made of
Value held less cumulative profit is the money people put in. The venue draws the two apart; the gap is the point.Range
Profit and loss since the vault opened, as the venue reports it. It ignores deposits and withdrawals: only trading moves this line.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Passport
Identity
Vault contract
0xc360c0e4…eb30
NetworkHyperliquid
Platform
Hyperliquid
OperatorBee0x1b62b7ef…00c7
Deposit assetUSDC
Created on-chain
Where the return came from
Gross realised−$2.4k
Trading fees−$317.99
Funding received$29.79
Net realised−$2.7k
Unrealised$59.54
Total−$2.7k
That is -25.54% on the capital the strategy currently runs.
- Slippage is not separated: without a book snapshot at fill time it cannot be measured, so it remains inside gross rather than being estimated.
- Funding is differenced across position snapshots, so it is a flow over the window rather than a level: it counts what changed hands while we were watching and nothing before that. Intervals where a position closed and reopened are refused rather than guessed, which makes the figure a floor.
- Gross realised PnL is not positive, so the cost ratio is not meaningful.
Underwater over this window. Collected $30 of funding and lost more than that trading.
Computed from 2,379 fills over the 27d in which funding could also be measured, so every part is taken from the same days. That window opens when we started watching, not when the vault started trading. Measured by differencing 318 snapshot intervals over 27 days. 25 of 343 intervals were not attributable, a position closed and reopened, or a snapshot was missed, so this is a floor.
Analyst tier
Detail is hidden, not absentHow well it executes
Built from 4,384 individual fills. Two strategies with identical signals can differ by hundreds of basis points purely in how they get filled, taker share, fee rate, slippage. This is the part of a result that is operational competence rather than market view, and it is what tells you whether a good year was skill or a good venue.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inHow this vault behaves
from 3,000 fills over 30.05 daysTiming indicates autonomous management, confidence 100%.
- · Trades continuously through every 6-hour window, including overnight.
- · Activity spread evenly across all 24 hours (evenness 0.973).
- · 99.8 fills per day, beyond sustained manual trading.
Overnight activity 59%
Hour-of-day evenness 97%
Cadence regularity 0%
Clock alignment 29%
Fills per day 99.8
Instruments 1
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good, a losing bot is still a bot.
Current exposure
1 positions · $8.8k gross · 0.8x the vault's capital| Instrument | Side | Notional | Share | Entry | Unrealised | Leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMR | long | $8.8k | 100% | 539.267 | $59.54 | 5x |
Snapshot taken 2026-10-03 02:34 UTC. A strategy that flips intraday can look flat at every snapshot and still carry risk in between. Click an instrument to see every other vault holding it.
How the capacity estimate was reached
- No instrument showed a positive edge against its realised cost.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMR | -5.3bps | 14% | $226.00 | No positive edge observed, capacity is not the binding constraint here. |
Who is in it
Money in and out
Ledger read 7 hours agoAnalyst tier
Detail is hidden, not absentWho is in this vault, and how much of it is one wallet
A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it. Concentration is the risk a return figure never shows, and it moves before the return line does.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inWhat changed the value
22 days decomposedThe section above says money moved. This says what the movement WAS. A vault grows because deposits arrived, or because the trading worked, or because it was paid to hold a position, and a size figure renders all three identically.
| Money in and outdeposits less withdrawals, and arriving is not earning | −$4,825 |
| Closed tradesrealised on the fills the venue reports | $294 |
| Feespaid to the venue on those fills | −$256 |
| Fundingpaid or received for holding the positions, from the venue's own ledger | $12 |
| Open positions movedchange in unrealised profit on what was still open | $106 |
| Not explainedwhat the terms above do not account for, 0.0% of the $6,603 that moved | $0 |
| Change in value$18,182 to $10,388, 2026-09-05 to 2026-10-02 | −$7,794 |
Performance, which is the change less what arrived and left, is −$2,969 over days and fills.
The shape of the record
296 completed round tripsRebuilt from the venue’s own open and close labels on every fill. A return figure cannot say whether it came from being right often and small or rarely and large, and those are opposite businesses.
Win rate
97%
Payoff
0.03
Profit factor
0.81
Median hold
1.3h
296 round trips, 97% of them profitable, holding a median 1.3 hours. The average win is $20 and the average loss $691, it wins far more often than it loses and loses more when it does. That is the signature of selling optionality, and it produces a clean equity curve until the day it does not.
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.